On Tue 2015-01-13T11:03:35 -0500, Brooks Harris hath writ: > This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet > http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
In that article is a link to a recent version of the Draft CPM document with the options that are being wordsmithed before the final tweak gets presented to the WRC in November http://acma.gov.au/Industry/Spectrum/Spectrum-planning/International-planning-ITU-and-other-international-planning-bodies/wrc-15-agenda-item-114 At the moment it still has options A, B, and C. There is also a similarly recent writeup from the ITU-R itself at https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/Documents/ITU-R-FAQ-UTC.pdf which gives a deeper story about the lack of vote in 2012 to ensure that all the technical options have been fully addressed in further studies related to the issue. It was necessary because the decision was not only of a technical nature but had some regulatory and legal consequences. -- Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
