On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 14:13 -0700, Hal Murray wrote: > > > > What do you think? > Sounds reasonable. > > I think the important points are some sort of checksum to help catch > mangled > files and an expiration date if you expect the file to cover modern > leap > seconds. > > If you expect that there really will be multiple variants of the > data, you > might put an ID into the file, maybe the author and year, any string > that > will be unique in that context.
With that much complexity, perhaps it should be formatted as an XML file. Do you think that would be reasonable? If so, how would you format it? John Sauter (john_sau...@systemeyescomputerstore.com) -- PGP fingerprint = E24A D25B E5FE 4914 A603 49EC 7030 3EA1 9A0B 511E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
