On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Zefram <zef...@fysh.org> wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: >>If you are going to willfully misunderstand, then I'm done being patient. > > I am not willfully misunderstanding. I have tried to understand > what you're doing, and I've been unable to find a system that works > consistently, uses the labelling of leap seconds on which we are agreed, > and yields TAI-UTC changing at the start of a positive leap second. > Please enlighten me. If you were to supply the couple of worked examples > that I have suggested, I believe that would shed much light on your > system.
I've already done exactly that. I'll see if I have time tomorrow to write it up again using TeX or something that's easier to format and explain with than ASCII text. Based on Tom's description of my method, I think he may misunderstand it too. It's as consistent as the calendar system we have today. Warner _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs