On 2018-03-17 19:02, Steve Allen wrote:


I am going to have to stop being amazed when I keep learning of yet
another person taking credit for inventing the leap second.  The 1970
IAU documents indicate that Winkler was one who warned that leap
seconds would cause trouble for automated systems.  They also make it
clear that there was not unanimity, and that there was overlap.


   [McCarthy 2009. p 228] states that leap seconds in UTC was an idea
   "introduced independently by Louis Essen and Gernot Winkler". It just
   was a variation of "Stepped Atomic Time" (SAT) that had gained some
   usage at the time, and was known to be practicable.

   Regardless of the amount of disagreement among astronomers then, there
   certainly seems to be some _current_ disagreement among astronomers about
   the future of UTC -- should leap seconds be omitted in the future so
   that UTC becomes a continuous time scale, or should we keep the current
   limit of |UT1 - UTC|?

   The current proposal [BIPM 2018. p 11..13, 32..33] for Resolution B of the
   General Conference of Weights and Measures 2018 makes UTC a time scale
   "produced by the BIPM" and recommends a revision of the limit |UT1 - UTC|.    While the proposed Resolution does recommend work on improved dissemination    of UT1 - UTC, it does not say anything about the dissemination of TAI - UTC.
   So, the likely future is that the limit on |UT1 - UTC| will be dropped,
   leap seconds will no longer be applied, and UTC will become a fixed
   translate of TAI (so that dissemination of TAI - UTC becomes unnecessary).

   Hence, people [astronomers?] interested in keeping the current definition
   of UTC should strive for improved dissemination of TAI - UTC, so as to
   make a continuous time scale easily accessible (for example, together with
   NTP time signals). The knowledge of current UTC, as a compromise between
   TAI and UT1, is, in the long term, obviously of less value than the knowledge    of both UT1 and TAI together; the short term advantage of using UTC may only    lie in the fact that it may be easier to newly disseminate TAI - UTC with UTC
   values than to extend the dissemniation of UTC to values of UT1 - UTC
   exceeding 1 s.

   [BIPM 2018] CGPM26 convocation: draft Resolution B
[https://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/CGPM/Convocation-2018.pdf]

   [McCarthy 2009] Dennis D McCarthy, P Kenneth Seidelmann: "Time -- From
      Earth Rotation to Atomic Physics". Wiley-VCH Verlag. 2009 Weinheim.
      ISBN 978-3-527-40780-4.

   Michael Deckers.

_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to