gree...@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > > The idea is to be able to allow newbies to easily build images > for common hardware. These images should be user-friendly, > including luci and other tools that may aid debugging and use > of the platform. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > --- > buildme.sh | 76 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > buildme_targets/x86_64/diffconfig.txt | 26 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 buildme.sh > create mode 100644 buildme_targets/x86_64/diffconfig.txt >
While I've written similar scripts for helping colleagues bootstrap a build, I'm not entirely convinced that adding more piles of shell script to the build tree is necessarily an improvement, if the goal is helping people build an image that suits them. Perhaps expanding the README to include examples of some common tasks, more guidance on how to use menuconfig, more examples of how to use the feeds scripts, and what they are. Perhaps even, if you're targetting total beginners, documenting how the image builder thing works would actually meet your goals better. I've never understood the image builder myself, it's documented here: https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/obtain.firmware.generate but seems complicated to follow that page. lede, like openwrt before it, still has large piles of undocumented usage methods, only uncovered by digging through script after script. Adding more scripts to hide the complexity/flexibility/power of some of those other scripts doesn't seem like a net gain. Sincerely, Karl Palsson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev