On 2016-07-14 23:10, Hans Dedecker wrote: > Felix, > > Currently the xl2tp protocol script registers itself as having > no_proto_task which is used in proto_shell_task_finish to send a > teardown when the shell is in setup state an having a proto task. > I re-used the no_proto_task flag to send a teardown in case l3 dev > link loss is detected. > Do I understand it correctly you favour adding an explicit flag (to be > set by the protocol script in this case l2tp) and thus decouple the > teardown from the no_proto_task flag ? Yes, that's exactly what I meant. What's your opinion on that?
- Felix _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev