On 2 November 2016 at 11:12, <p.wa...@gmx.at> wrote: > If so, wouldn't it be clearer (for people like me :) ) if there were two > seperate patches (i.e. one for kernel update+refreshes itself and one for the > internal > refreshes (or refreshes that have been missed in previous updates) )?
It could be nice to have all patches properly formatted and updated (refreshed) all the time, but it's sometimes easy to miss that. I don't care about having commits *that* cleanly separated, as long as refreshes are trivial, I'm OK with that. It may be you're spending more time on this trivial issue than it's worth ;) -- Rafał _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
