On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:28:24 +0200 Daniel Golle <dan...@makrotopia.org> wrote:
> hi! > > i believe that on some targets it would be nice to have cgroups, > namespaces, seccomp and misc stuff needed for LXC as well as systemd- > based guests enabled by default. > currently there is only a single default for those CONFIG_KERNEL_* > symbols and changing Config-kernel.in to have them selected on > specific targets feels like the wrong place. > thus my question: can we introduce FEATURE flags similar to low_mem > and small_flash, such as massive_ram and abundant_flash to indicate > that it doesn't make sense to be too stingy on specific (sub-)target? > could the present of such FEATURE flags influence the defaults in > config/Config-*.in? > on another page this infrastructure could also be done via DEVICE_TYPE > (see target.mk), however, that assumes that all devices of a specific > target belong to the same type, which isn't true e.g. on mvebu which > is commonly used for routers as well as NAS devices ranging from a > few megs of SPI NOR up to hundreds of megs of NAND. > > what do you think? i reckon there are also other places where defaults > should diverge e.g. for having debugging stuff built-in by default or > have more generous busybox defaults. > I agree totally. Another possible inclusion are the POSIX ACL stuff (which actually is not very big and even an 8/128 router handles it fine). Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev