> On Mar 5, 2017, at 8:06 AM, Matthias Schiffer > <mschif...@universe-factory.net> wrote: > > This could also avoid adding host UCI support to the build system, making the > whole patchset a lot smaller.
Host support for UCI is useful to have anyway, for other reasons… not something to avoid doing (not clear if you were against the principle of having UCI be on the host, or just trying to keep this particular patchset down to the bare minimum). For instance, you could have platform-specific scripts that dynamically generate the initial configuration in the target image by doing UCI batch/add/commit sequences… -Philip _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
