On Freitag, 5. Mai 2017 14:34:18 CEST Mathias Kresin wrote:
> I haven't checked how similar the ubnt-erx and ubnt-erx-sfp device
> tree source files are. But it might be more elegant to move stuff
> which is the same between both boards to a dtsi, include the dtsi for
> the ubnt-erx* and add all missing stuff in the ubnt-erx-sfp dts.
> 
> Depending on what is really required, there might be the following
> commits in the end:
> 
> - split ubnt-erx into dtsi
> - add ubnt-erx poe passthrough gpios
> - add ubnt-erx-stp support

Mathias, 
that's the plan. 
So I just send a patch for the original / current UNBT-ERX.dts, which 
implements your changes. this will then act as "template" for the other sub-
model.

Sven

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to