On Freitag, 5. Mai 2017 14:34:18 CEST Mathias Kresin wrote: > I haven't checked how similar the ubnt-erx and ubnt-erx-sfp device > tree source files are. But it might be more elegant to move stuff > which is the same between both boards to a dtsi, include the dtsi for > the ubnt-erx* and add all missing stuff in the ubnt-erx-sfp dts. > > Depending on what is really required, there might be the following > commits in the end: > > - split ubnt-erx into dtsi > - add ubnt-erx poe passthrough gpios > - add ubnt-erx-stp support
Mathias, that's the plan. So I just send a patch for the original / current UNBT-ERX.dts, which implements your changes. this will then act as "template" for the other sub- model. Sven _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev