I, too, look forward to putting energy where it matters.
However in reply to your point, how could it? When the first stable
release was made mere months ago.
The last patch that was submitted by QCA to add support for IPQ40XX, was
submitted to LEDE.
I simply hoped, that since there was a shake-off that catapulted all the
great things which resulted in LEDE, that this new name made more sense
to what the project hopes to represent as a whole, regardless of this
perceived "brand value" and all that.
Regards,
A. Benz
On 05/09/17 14:05, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2017, A. Benz via Lede-dev wrote:
Likewise, OpenWRT while more recognizable than LEDE, is not worth as
much as people here paint it, and will only remain relevant as long as
people keep using it. Market/brand concept (in retail) doesn't really
apply.
I'll point out that just last week we had an official contact from the
Open Compute project to OpenWRT looking to integrate OpenWRT for dealing
with wifi devices in Open Compute.
Open Compute is a pretty significant project that's expected to keep up
with technology. If they do not know of LEDE and think of OpenWRT for
the purpose, it shows that LEDE has not make the progress that you think
it has in name recognition.
But in any case, the decision has been made, it doesn't really help to
keep arguing the name issue. There's enough other work to be done.
I'm glad to see this progress and look forward to the remerge happening.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
