> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:11 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found here [1]. > > the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders > backports/pending/hacks.
What’s the criteria for each? And isn’t “hacks” kind of self-defeating? If someone submits a PR that adds something to “hacks”, won’t the default position be, “since this is admittedly a hack, it’s not really needed and you should find a more compelling fix”? -Philip > > I'd like to push this asap if there are no mayor issues as it will be a pain > to rebase once again > > John > > > [1] > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/blogic/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/patches-cleanup > _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
