On 21.08.2017 16:34, Karl Palsson wrote:
on master, even with the ntpd patch for busybox applied.
# ntpdate -q localhost
server ::1, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000
server 127.0.0.1, stratum 0, offset 0.000000, delay 0.00000 21
Aug 14:26:24 ntpdate[1392]: no server suitable for
synchronization found
# echo $?
1
# ntpd -w -d -p localhost
ntpd: sending query to 127.0.0.1
ntpd: reply from 127.0.0.1: peer is unsynced
ntpd: sending query to 127.0.0.1
Thanks for the clarification. Running ntpd like before (-p
bad.example.org -p ntp.uio.no), LEDE master with Busybox 1.27.2 does
seem to work:
root@LEDE:~# ntpdate -q ::1
server ::1, stratum 3, offset 0.000028, delay 0.02777
23 Aug 19:12:55 ntpdate[5416]: adjust time server ::1 offset 0.000028 sec
root@LEDE:~# echo $?
0
I also tested against my OpenWrt 15.05 VM and the current LEDE x86_64
snapshot (r4723), and they both give the expected output as you describe
(OpenWrt similar to above, LEDE fails).
Note that my patch in Patchwork only updates to Busybox 1.27.1, I will
send the 1.27.2 patch shortly, after rebasing and testing it.
Regards
/Magnus
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
