On 10/28/2017 4:52 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:

Philip Prindeville wrote on 28.10.2017 23:20:
Hi all,

Does it seem to anyone else that we’re making this more complicated than it needs to be?

If one of the goals we’re going for from here on out is “equality”, then a basic litmus test to be applied to any action might be “does this get us closer to a level playing field, or further away”?

Since not everyone gets an @openwrt.org email address, I think the answer to “can we use @openwrt.org email addresses in SOB’s?” is by extension, “no, because it doesn’t get us closer to a level playing field."

We don’t need to argue the finer points of the letter of the law if the spirit of the law is already adequately clear.

-Philip


Full Ack!
And in addition, from my point of view, the openwrt mail service got
seriously tainted, when the early LEDE founders got their @openwrt.org
accounts deactivated without prior notice. What is it worth having such
an address in a SOB, if you can't trust that it will last?
Thanks,
Actually you've both hit the nail on the head, the email accounts were disabled immediately after the LEDE announcement because it was announced using an openwrt email address but without discussion, prior knowledge or approval from the rest of the group.

(All history now, let's work on fixing things)

- Mike

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to