Matthias-Christian Ott <o...@mirix.org> wrote:
> We could unify all packages to use a single cryptography library, for
> example LibreSSL or mbed TLS. We could save some space, effort for
For some narrow things they are slightly interchangeable, but for many things
you want one of these to avoid the bloat of openssl. The corollory of that
is if you want to unify, you wind up with the most bloated library, which is
openssl.
I don't think that mbedtls has an openssl compatible API, so the application
has to support it directly (at least, my use of it has not used such a thing)
> I had a look at this for dropbear because I would like to add Ed25519
> support to it. It didn't seem to require a lot of effort.
> Do you think it would be worth the effort to unify the cryptography
> libraries in LEDE?
It would certainly be cool.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
