> On 17 Dec 2017, at 17:22, Etienne Haarsma <bladeoner...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> uint8_t *oob = ops->oobbuf;
> uint8_t *buf = ops->datbuf;
> -@@ -2662,7 +2697,7 @@ err_out:
> - static int panic_nand_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
> - size_t *retlen, const uint8_t *buf)
> - {
> -- struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
> -+ struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> - struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
> - int ret;
> -I’m unconvinced this is the correct thing to do - in essence just dropping that bit of the patch. Will panic to nand still work? Kevin
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
