On 02/18/2018 10:21 PM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
On 2/18/2018 21:26, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Philip Prindeville
<philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote:
On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the
router is useful for connecting to other devices in the same LAN.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek <stefan.toma...@wertarbyte.de>
sorry for the late reply, it has been discussed over and over and the decision
was made to not enable telnet by default. sorry ...
John
Too bad. While it’s a liability for logging in, it’s a great tool for testing
remote services like HTTP, SMTP, IMAP, JetDirect printers, etc.
SNIP
looks like it is possible to keep the telnet applet only, not telnetd. if this
is not wanted for size, is there an alternative to interact with a port
pushing/receiving characters?
..ede
_______________________________________________
There is a closed (not merged) PR for the packages repo that adds
telnet-bsd package, which is a commonly used telnet client, and is
independent from Busybox. The code is still available, and should work fine.
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/4509
-Alberto
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
