Right, except in this case I'm only getting a register report for the
Assets:Checking account (and sub-accounts).
The default ledger register will show how things balance to 0 for each
entry, but doesn't show running totals the way it does in my example.
So close and yet...
Thanks for trying to help, I think I'm not being clear enough though. :-(
-=Doug


On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 00:02, Craig Earls <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not seeing what you want.  The default ledger register format gives
> something like this for entries with multiple accounts:
>
> 012/03/05 Pelican Parts        Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 50.00      $
> 50.00
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 62.50     $
> 112.50
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 11.50     $
> 124.00
>                                 Assets:VWCU:Joint         $
> -124.00            0
> 2012/04/03 Pelican Parts        Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 86.90      $
> 86.90
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 7.50      $
> 94.40
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 5.00      $
> 99.40
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies      $ 158.00     $
> 257.40
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 5.00     $
> 262.40
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 7.50     $
> 269.90
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 95.75     $
> 365.65
>                                 Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 18.75     $
> 384.40
>                                 Assets:VWCU:Joint         $
> -384.40            0
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 20:26, Doug Philips <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, here is an example (fixed width font needed):
>>
>> Given normal register output:
>> (one entry shown, vastly summarized with two transactions where than
>> can be 6-12 of the same type):
>>
>> 2012/02/08  Deposits  Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
>> $total1   ; name of member1
>>                      Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
>> $total2   ; name of member2
>>                      Assets:Checking:Event:A              $jk.lm
>>  $total3
>>                      Assets:Checking:Event:B              $jk.lm
>>  $total4
>>
>>
>> And then with -n:
>>
>> 2012/02/08  Deposits  <Total>                             $nop.qr
>>  $total4
>>
>>
>> What I'd like to see is:
>> 2012/02/08  Deposits  Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
>> $total1   ; name of member1
>>                      Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
>> $total2   ; name of member2
>>                      Assets:Checking:Event:A              $jk.lm
>>  $total3
>>                      Assets:Checking:Event:B              $jk.lm
>>  $total4
>>                      <total>                             $nop.qr
>>  $total4
>>
>>
>> So I run the same register command twice, once without -n and with -n
>> and then try to line them up (or hand edit).
>> Thanks!
>>   -Doug
>>
>> P.S. I'd really really like to have subtotals for the 3rd level
>> accounts (configurable as to how deep to go to summarize) for each
>> entry, but one step at a time. :-)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:57, Craig Earls <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Can you post an example of what you want to see?  I have never used 2.6
>> > and
>> > don't know the options, but I am pretty good with 3.0 format strings.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 19:41, Doug Philips <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm still using 2.6, but if this can be done in 3, I'll upgrade! I've
>> >> looked over the docs from ledger-cli.org/docs.html and can't seem to
>> >> find what I'm looking for...
>> >
>> > --
>> > Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ
>> > enderw88.wordpress.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ
> enderw88.wordpress.com

Reply via email to