Richard,

I have read your investigation, did the same testing and I agree with you. 
It is not logical for me either, how ledger  shows unrealized gains in your 
example.

But this is actually another reason I was looking for a such single "total 
income statement-like report", because one could use it for verification.

A delta between Net Worth of 2 balance sheets reports shall always be equal 
to total Net Income  over the time period between these 2 Balance Sheet 
reports.  This shall be true for any period and when expressed in any 
currency (-X option)

Regards.

On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 10:10:49 PM UTC+1, Richard Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, 
>
> In trying to answer Chary's question, I have realized I do not have a 
> very good grip on how to think about "unrealized" gains and losses, and 
> how ledger calculates them.  So I wrote a few test cases to help explain 
> it to myself.  (Can you tell I'm procrastinating a little bit? ;) I am 
> not sure, but I *may* have discovered a bug: see Example 3.  Can someone 
> explain this to me? 
>
> Example 1: you hold a certain quantity of stock throughout the 
> entire period, during which its value fluctuates.  Say you hold 2 
> shares of AAPL.  At the beginning of the period, each is worth $500. 
> At the end, each is worth $525. 
>
> 2018/12/31 Opening Balances 
>     Assets:Stocks                                  2 AAPL @ $500 
>     Equity:Opening Balances 
>
> P 2019/01/01 AAPL $500 
> P 2019/02/01 AAPL $515 
> P 2019/03/01 AAPL $525 
>
> The unrealized gain is then: 
>   (2 AAPL * $525) - (2 AAPL * $500) = $1050 - $1000 = $50 
> i.e., 
>   (end quantity * end price) - (beginning quantity * beginning price) 
>
> That is exactly what ledger reports, with --unrealized: 
>
> ledger -f test.journal bal Assets:Stocks -X '$' --unrealized 
>
>                $1050  Assets:Stocks 
>                 $-50  Equity:Unrealized Gains 
> -------------------- 
>                $1000 
>
> ====================================================================== 
> Example 2: you hold a certain quantity of stock throughout the 
> entire period, but you also acquire more at some point in the 
> middle.  Say you hold 2 AAPL at the beginning of the period, each 
> worth $500. At some later point, when AAPL is up to $510, you buy 
> one more share.  At the end of the period, all three shares are 
> worth $525.   
>
> 2018/12/31 Opening Balances 
>     Assets:Stocks                                  2 AAPL @ $500 
>     Assets:Checking                         $1000.00 
>     Equity:Opening Balances 
>
> P 2019/01/01 AAPL $500 
>
> P 2019/02/01 AAPL $510 
>
> 2019/02/02 Broker 
>     Assets:Stocks                                  1 AAPL @ $510.00 
>     Assets:Checking 
>     
> P 2019/03/01 AAPL $525 
>
> I would then expect the unrealized gain to be: 
>   (3 AAPL * $525) - (2 AAPL * $500 + 1 AAPL * $510) = $65 
>
> Again, this is just what ledger says: 
>
> ledger -f test.journal bal Assets:Stocks -X '$' --unrealized 
>             $1575.00  Assets:Stocks 
>              $-65.00  Equity:Unrealized Gains 
> -------------------- 
>             $1510.00 
>
> ====================================================================== 
> Now for the problematic example: 
>
> Example 3: you sell some stock at one point when the price 
> rises, and reacquire it when the price drops.  Say you start holding 
> 2 shares of AAPL, each worth $500.  Then, when the price is up to 
> $540, you sell one share, resulting in a realized gain of $40. 
> Later, the price drops to $490 and you buy another share.  At the 
> end of the period, the price is $525, and you also have $50 in the bank. 
>
> 2018/12/31 Opening Balances 
>     Assets:Stocks                                  2 AAPL @ $500 
>     Equity:Opening Balances 
>
> P 2019/02/01 AAPL $540 
>
> 2019/02/02 Broker 
>     Assets:Stocks                                 -1 AAPL @ $540.00 
>     Assets:Checking 
>
> P 2019/02/10 AAPL $490 
>
> 2019/02/10 Broker 
>     Assets:Stocks                                  1 AAPL @ $490 
>     Assets:Checking 
>   
> P 2019/03/01 AAPL $525 
>
> Now, what is the unrealized gain here?  First of all, it's not clear how 
> this should be calculated.  I thought of two reasonable ways to 
> calculate it, which give different results. From one perspective, this 
> example is the same as Example 1: you started and ended the period with 
> 2 shares of AAPL, worth $500 each at the beginning and $525 at the end, 
> for an unrealized gain of $50.  But following the logic of Example 2, 
> counting unrealized gains only from the first time the share is 
> acquired, we'd get: 
>   $525 - $500 = $25 unrealized gain for Share #1 (held the whole period) 
>   $525 - $490 = $35 unrealized gain for Share #3 (bought on 2019/02/10) 
> leading to a total of $60 of unrealized gain.   
>
> Ledger actually does it differently.  It says we have $150 in 
> unrealized gains, and $50 in unrealized losses: 
>
> ledger -f test.journal bal Assets:Stocks -X '$' --unrealized 
>             $1050.00  Assets:Stocks 
>             $-100.00  Equity 
>             $-150.00    Unrealized Gains 
>               $50.00    Unrealized Losses 
> -------------------- 
>              $950.00 
>
> Huh?  Here's what I think is going on: 
>
> Consider Share #1, held for the whole period. 
> It first gained $40 in value, lost $50, and then gained $35. 
> So, $75 in unrealized gains, $50 in unrealized losses. 
>
> Share #3 was bought at $490 and then moved to $525 at the end of the 
> period. 
> So, that's another $35 in unrealized gains. 
> Together with Share #1's unrealized gains, that's a total of $110. 
>
> Share #2 was sold at the first price move, on 2019/02/02.  As far as I 
> can see, it should have *no* unrealized gains or losses.  (It has, 
> instead, a *realized* gain of $40.) 
>
> Ledger reports $150 in unrealized gains rather than $110, so it must be 
> including that $40 from Share #2 as unrealized gains.  That seems wrong 
> to me, since that gain was realized, not unrealized.  Is this a bug?  Or 
> am I missing something? 
>
> By the way, the results are the same even if I annotate the sale of 
> Share #2 with the lot price, like: 
>
> 2019/02/02 Broker 
>     Assets:Stocks                                 -1 AAPL {$500} @ $540.00 
>     Assets:Checking 
>
> They're also the same if I delete the redundant price declaration on 
> 2019/02/01.  So these can't be what's going wrong -- if something is 
> wrong!  Again, I'm not sure I understand this.  Can someone explain it? 
>
> Thanks for reading! 
>
> -- 
> Best, 
> Richard 
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to