On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Chris Travers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all; > > I have spent some time looking at Catalyst to see what would be > required to make LedgerSMB run according to current development > approaches (close to the db, etc) and the result isn't easy. > Basically, at a minimum, the following would need to be ported: > > 1) Our model > 2) Authentication handlers and session handlers > 3) While HTML templates could use appropriate Catalyst classes, > LaTeX-based views would need to be ported.... Similarly plaint text > templates might or might not be able to be handled directly. > 4) Printing directly to a printer would require subclassing existing > views.... >
Would this be an interesting time to look at a joint venture between LedgerSMB and p2ee ? My Inventory module was due to release in December but I paused it due mainly to stress. Most of the p2ee general framework ideas are done and only needed tom complete the first actual application. I would be glad to set-up a working development environment or wait until I publish the Development Virtual Box. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
