On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Luke <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any way to provide basic functionality similar to 1.2, and use > all of this as an LSMB module?
Well, as 2.0 takes shape we will have to decide whether or not to do this. One option is that we could take the SQL-based prototypes and use those. Ideally, I would like to see this sort of type get distributed with PostgreSQL eventually (as a contrib module or the like). > > (That's probably already the plan, but if you're backing this with a type, > then maybe not...) The plan is currently open and will depend on a few things. Basically, if a stable, cross-platform, pre-compiled set of binaries of the type is available, then we could just distribute it in our contrib/ directory. If not, we may want to just use the SQL-based prototypes. If this is a matter of a PostgreSQL contrib package, that would be easy to handle. Otherwise we're going to have to do some work anyway to address additional dependencies in a way that doesn't require roaming the web to find pieces. > > If the idea of 2.0 is "Kis - add what you need", then a small single > employee local service company, should not have to deal with all this re > extra dependencies, etc.. Right. We have been looking at possibly using PgTAP for the test cases in SQL and that poses the same problem..... Best wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
