On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > 2.0 of LedgerSMB is going to branch soon. The primary goal of 2.0 is to
Is there any intent to do a final release of 1.3, or will it continue to be worked on concurrently? > eliminate all legacy code from our SQL-Ledger heritage. However, there > are other goals that others may have that I would like to start a > discussion on. Presumably, Chris's modularization model will be preserved? > My Primary goals are: > > I firmly believe we need to eliminate Latex or at least not make it a > requirement and move to more modern technologies to generate invoices. Probably agreed. What did you have in mind as potential replacements? > I would like to create a new template for presentation. The old template > is fine for some folks but pretty matters and I want to eliminate frames > and push to a proper ajax style interface. (again optional) I am one who routinely fights for non-js interfaces to be preserved. I work in enough odd platforms, and support users who also do, that having graceful degradation is a 100%, app becomes useless without it, requirement. By the same token, of course, for standard browsers, a much more friendly UI would be welcome. I would go as far as saying that the web interface should also be modular to permit this. Of course, that would require that no key functions be implemented *only* in the UI. > Lastly, for 2.0 we are moving to Git. We have already created the > repository and will slowly begin to populate over the coming months. Glad that's finally happening! Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
