Actually thinking about this a bit more.... On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Chris Travers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all; > > I am thinking after 1.3.18 is released we may want to merge a few very > specific parts of the 1.4 framework into 1.3. > > * LedgerSMB::App_State namespace and maintenance for tracking database > connections, locale objects an the like. Basically this is set up > during the initial request process and torn down at the end. > > * LedgerSMB::PGDate object type. This is an intermediary type which > stores date and timestamp info and allows greater consistency of > formatting when sending the objects to TT.
Might not be a bad idea to backport the intermediary formats as an add-on and auto-detect them in the LSMB code so as to minimize patches. This would give some time to see what the actual impact is so we don't cause problems in a production branch., Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
