On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:24 -0400, Chris Travers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Robert James Clay <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:02 -0400, John Locke wrote: > >> SF is annoying, by comparison... > > > > <shrug> I don't find it so (I've had a SourceForge account much > > longer but I've also had a GitHUB account for a while); although it's > > also true that for those SF projects I'm an admin on, I'm changing (or > > have changed) them over to the new SF project framework ("Allura"). > > (Which includes sub-projects, btw...) > > What are the advantages of the new framework?
Integration is one major thing. Things like a "Wiki, Tracker, SCM (svn, git and hg), Discussion, and Blog tools" are all part of the same framework now. And the sub-projects that can now be created can each have their own set of the same things; that's what drew me into investigating the new framework. Things like the project catagorization has been redone, and sub-projects can be done separately. Jame ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
