On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Lyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29/03/2014 21:44, Lyle wrote: > > If you can supply patches as unidiff attachments, that's a solution for > now. We're contemplating moving to github, in which case you could simply > submit pull requests. Do you have github experience? > > > Yes I do. I've found Git and github a pleasure to work with compared to > svn. Obviously there is a small learning curve going from svn to git, but > git is fundamentally better at dealing with multiple disperse contributors. > Don't take my word for it, just google git vs svn. > > To be honest, I *much* prefer mercurial to git. And one of the big selling points on my side is that subversion now for the most part just works against a github repository, so a framework which provides first-rate support for svn, mercurial, and git to he repositories is very helpful. This is not to the place to go into the reasons for my preference, but I will say that, assuming we move, svn will still be supported, and those looking for a dvcs with easy entry from svn may want to check out Mercurial. The major reason for the likely move is better support for a wider range of vcs tools. > > Lyle > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel > > -- Best Wishes, Chris Travers Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
