Hi all,
After implementing BDD tests for setup.pm, our coverage % hasn't changed
the slightest. While I had serious doubts that the code coverage hadn't
changed, I left it alone, since we have lots of items to work on. OTOH, I'd
really like to see a coverage figure which resembles actual code tested, so
I started looking at it again.
https://github.com/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/50 suggests that there's no way
to have starman figures extracted correctly. The same post suggests using
HTTP::Server::PSGI (which comes with Plack) will work around this problem.
Does anybody have experience with this? Or even better, any help to get a
solution which extracts and reports the coverage information would we
highly appreciated!
--
Bye,
Erik.
http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
