-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:11:58 -0800 "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do we really eventually want all tables to be loaded for all users > anyway long-run? Or would it be better to have per-module table > definitions and upgrade scripts? Not all but in this case it would tightly couple with projects, work orders, tasks etc... > > I have some tables (reasonably well-normalized) you could review if > you really want to get this in as a marketing bullet point, but my > view is that we should worry less about marketing features which will > be incomplete for the foreseable future than about. My previous > tables could use some minor re-design (in handling subscriber v. > owner handling) but are *way* more flexible than anything I have ever > seen in other CRM's. Sure, I am not looking at this from a let's make plastic paper look good. I am just saying that from a consistency stand point it would be useful as we push into the other features that need work for 1.4 (projects, estimates, workorders). Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHn3ZCATb/zqfZUUQRAhL0AJ49UW3iOvHyaBm4LVyr1/IgT1SoWgCfeKKf XSMkezoKPeW/Tm64sf5+LRY= =xFWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
