On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Lyle wrote: > On 30/01/2011 19:44, Chris Travers wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote: >>>> In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I >>>> expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like to be able to add >>>> compatibility classes for Catalyst and others if necessary. >>> Catalyst is a major pain, it adds needless complexity, quickly creates >>> dependency hell, and you can say goodbye to running smoothly through >>> CGI. Had to work on it with one of my part time contracts, not a fan at >>> all. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by compatibility class but >>> putting LedgerSMB onto Catalyst would be a mistake. >> I'm inclined to agree with you on this, actually. The question is for >> those who WANT to run it on Catalyst should we provide some method of >> support? I don't think we have enough information to answer that at >> this time, but I'd like to leave open the possibility. > > The only way I can think of doing this would be to make everything > modular (if it's not already) and separate all the web UI stuff from all > the data methods and functionality. That way they could choose to put > whatever front on it they wanted. You could also define a clear API as > an alternative to the template based web UI, that way any Perl framework > or other piece of software in any language for that matter could provide > a front for Ledger. Seems to be the way a lot of applications are going
What I said!:-) I was pushing for that back when 2.0 was first being discussed. I'm blind, and also do a non-trivial percentage of work with mobile platforms. The two of those lead me to a lot of weird interface concerns, that the average mozilla user isn't going to hit. It has caused me to have a certain lack of desire to be locked into a single interface. So I wanted there to be a server side API, and all clients talking to that, including a web service client, which would then serve web clients, which would probably be running on the same server as the server side software. Maybe interact through XML exchange or the like, to keep it stateless. > these days. I've even seen some do away with most of the server side > generated from template pages, and create the entire UI with JavaScript > interacting with the API... Now that's just scary. Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
