I second Erik's suggestion. The voiding process seems incomplete to me if it requires me posting a dummy payment in order to have it marked as closed
Andrew On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Replying to myself: I think that if we can create reports which exclude > reversed and reversal transactions, that serves both the accounting audit > trail purpose and the optical "I've deleted the transaction" purpose for > good overview. > > Bye, > > Erik. > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Chris Travers <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi; >>> >>> I would like to propose that we stop allowing transactions to be >>> reposted or deleted in 1.4, and instead always require transaction >>> reversal. >>> >>> Is there any objection to this? >>> >>> >> Here's my strong support for the proposal. >> >> >> Bye, >> >> Erik. >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 > > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
