Re: Deleting an invoice.
I fully agree with Chris and Erik Huelsman

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:11 PM, <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Send Ledger-smb-users mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ledger-smb-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. deleting an invoice (Michael Richardson)
>    2. Re: deleting an invoice (Tone Irene Andersen)
>    3. Re: deleting an invoice (Nigel Titley)
>    4. Re: deleting an invoice (Chris Travers)
>    5. Re: deleting an invoice (Lyle)
>    6. Re: deleting an invoice (Chris Travers)
>    7. Re: deleting an invoice (Erik Huelsmann)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:24:20 -0400
> From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: ledger-smb-users <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
>
> with 1.3.18, I get:
>
> DELETE FROM invoice WHERE trans_id = ?
> ERROR: update or delete on table "invoice" violates foreign key
> constraint "invoice_tax_form_invoice_id_fkey" on table
> "invoice_tax_form"
> DETAIL: Key (id)=(77399) is still referenced from table
> "invoice_tax_form".
>
> when deleting an unpaid/unreconciled invoice.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:29:37 +0200
> From: Tone Irene Andersen <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <D419BC80E0DB47E4BE50CFA6FBA62E10@tiaPB>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed;
>         reply-type=original
>
> Hi.
>
> You arent suppose to delete an invoice, rather void it. If you delete it
> you
> make issues in your books.
>
>
> Mvh / Best Regards
>
>
> Tone Irene Andersen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:24 PM
> To: ledger-smb-users
> Subject: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
>
>
> with 1.3.18, I get:
>
> DELETE FROM invoice WHERE trans_id = ?
> ERROR: update or delete on table "invoice" violates foreign key
> constraint "invoice_tax_form_invoice_id_fkey" on table
> "invoice_tax_form"
> DETAIL: Key (id)=(77399) is still referenced from table
> "invoice_tax_form".
>
> when deleting an unpaid/unreconciled invoice.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:12:21 +0100
> From: Nigel Titley <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 30/08/2012 20:29, Tone Irene Andersen wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > You arent suppose to delete an invoice, rather void it. If you delete it
> you
> > make issues in your books.
> >
> That's true, but he shouldn't be getting an pg error message, especially
> if there is a "delete" button for him to press
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:27:10 -0700
> From: Chris Travers <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>         <CAKt_ZfsarqJLYORXr=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Nigel Titley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 30/08/2012 20:29, Tone Irene Andersen wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > You arent suppose to delete an invoice, rather void it. If you delete
> it
> > you
> > > make issues in your books.
> > >
> > That's true, but he shouldn't be getting an pg error message, especially
> > if there is a "delete" button for him to press
> >
> > This is true.  I forget what we decided to do about this in 1.3.  In 1.4
> you can't delete but you can void.  The thing is:
>
> 1)  Disabling transaction reversal enforcement kind of puts you on
> unsupported territory anyway.   There are a lot of hidden gotchas that
> happen when you start deleting invoices and these don't have accepted
> solutions accounting-wise because you aren't supposed to delete them.  For
> example you can end up with *really* weird COGS numbers.
>
> 2)  At the same time occasionally we run into cases where people can't do
> without deleting the invoices.  So we have the option.
>
> I am thinking the best solution here is to put a warning on the audit
> controls screen so people are aware that this is not a supported
> configuration and that more work will need to be done by whoever disables
> it.
>
> What do other people think?
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:07:51 +0100
> From: Lyle <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 31/08/2012 06:27, Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Nigel Titley <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 30/08/2012 20:29, Tone Irene Andersen wrote:
> >     > Hi.
> >     >
> >     > You arent suppose to delete an invoice, rather void it. If you
> >     delete it you
> >     > make issues in your books.
> >     >
> >     That's true, but he shouldn't be getting an pg error message,
> >     especially
> >     if there is a "delete" button for him to press
> >
> > This is true.  I forget what we decided to do about this in 1.3.  In
> > 1.4 you can't delete but you can void.  The thing is:
>
> As I understand, even Quickbooks has a delete option. The thing is,
> certainly for new and trainee bookkeepers, you make so many mistakes
> that the books simply wouldn't be readable without this.
>
> > What do other people think?
>
> I think it should be supported properly.
>
>
> Lyle
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:06:20 -0700
> From: Chris Travers <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cakt_zfvv-vjf2b+3wfyzt3yq6gessvq9xy8l2gqf5xd7wt1...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Lyle <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I think it should be supported properly.
> >
> > Can you define what proper behavior is when an invoice is deleted, FIFO
> inventory behavior is used, and the price of the item is volatile?  This is
> where our nasty surprises currently come in.  Of course you can't get help
> from accountants because the workflow itself violates generally accepted
> accounting principles and practices.  Quickbooks gets away from this a bit
> because they don't support FIFO inventory valuation, probably because it
> leads to an inability to sanely delete invoices).  They use average cost
> instead.
>
> The second problem has to do with auditability.  If you can delete invoices
> generally after they have become a part of the financial records of your
> business, then internal controls largely don't matter.
>
> What we will support (and I think that this is as close to "proper support"
> as possible) in 1.4 is two stage entry and approval.  Enter a transaction,
> save it.  Review it.  At this point it is not part of the books.  It is not
> an invoice.  It cannot be printed or emailed.  It is just a record that can
> become an invoice.  It can be deleted or approved.  Once it is approved it
> is shown in the reports as an invoice and can no longer be deleted.  This
> is the proper way (accounting-wise) to handle the data entry issue.
>  Deleting invoices after they have been posted to the books though is a
> recipe for bad things on all levels and I can't see how we can ever support
> this.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:11:42 +0200
> From: Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] deleting an invoice
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cacoob6h1dcokykyk368_s1ckaecagxgssuvfbfvd0v6g9xr...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi all,
>
> To help trainee bookkeepers, I always keep a current backup / training copy
> of my books. They prepare the invoice or posting in the test copy and when
> the senior validates it as correct, they copy it over to production.
>
> If you don't want to work that way: simply revoke their right to post the
> invoices. Seniors can verify before posting the invoice without causing the
> extra confusing postings.
>
> I really believe there's a process or social issue behind this and as Chris
> said, deleting poses issues for which there is no acceptable answer from a
> finance perspective.
>
> Also: an invoice is a claim on someone's assets. If you cancel that claim,
> you should keep records that you did.
>
> Concluding: I'm not at all on favor of supporting deletion. If voided
> invoices need comments to make the books understandable, there's the option
> to add internal notes.
>
> My 2c.
>
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
>
> sent from my phone
> On Aug 31, 2012 11:40 AM, "Lyle" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 31/08/2012 06:27, Chris Travers wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Nigel Titley <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     On 30/08/2012 20:29, Tone Irene Andersen wrote:
> > >     > Hi.
> > >     >
> > >     > You arent suppose to delete an invoice, rather void it. If you
> > >     delete it you
> > >     > make issues in your books.
> > >     >
> > >     That's true, but he shouldn't be getting an pg error message,
> > >     especially
> > >     if there is a "delete" button for him to press
> > >
> > > This is true.  I forget what we decided to do about this in 1.3.  In
> > > 1.4 you can't delete but you can void.  The thing is:
> >
> > As I understand, even Quickbooks has a delete option. The thing is,
> > certainly for new and trainee bookkeepers, you make so many mistakes
> > that the books simply wouldn't be readable without this.
> >
> > > What do other people think?
> >
> > I think it should be supported properly.
> >
> >
> > Lyle
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Live Security Virtual Conference
> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
>
>
> End of Ledger-smb-users Digest, Vol 71, Issue 9
> ***********************************************
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to