Yup that thought has come to mind on a number of occasions especialy when each new investment in the infrastructure is announced while Uncle Ken pleads poverty and the need for fiscal restraint... Isn't the hotel supposed to be physically attached to said non-owned property? It does beggar belief that anyone would claim that he couldn't afford the purchase the ground at the buy-back clause rate and then turn around and spend as much ,if not more in renovating that same piece of property for the mysterious owner's benefit. Still look on the bright side...We'll have a very enticing and comfy place to put up all those journeyman loanees for years to come.. Ahhh, blessed be our saviour!
From: Paul Cundell <p...@cundell.com> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2011 1:59 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Where now? I find it a tad confusing that we are spent a fortune renovating a property we don't own. Similarly, I find it confusing that we are spending another fortune building a hotel instead of purchasing the property we're renovating that we don't own. Anyone else share my confusion? Of course, if said property turned out to be owned by our owner and the hotel ends up being used as collateral to pay off loans made by our current owner that mysteriously appear on the club balance sheet, it wouldn't be so confusing. Paul PS That's me banned from Elland Road I guess. PPS Probably the list too PPPS And Ian's Xmas card list PPPPS This could all be true _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
