Good teams that win on a bad day have the luxury of being a "good team" that
had a blip.
We've had a good start to the season - I'm sure nobody would disagree, but if
any team is
outplayed on a regular basis as we were against Ipswich for periods of that
game, then the long term outlook
is not good. A team playing well and losing is less of a problem than a team
winning against the run of play in my book.
I suppose there is the psychological advantage of winning that strengthens team
core and self belief, but with the risk of missing the reality of what's really
happening.
In the end though, when it all averages out, teams that are outplayed on a
regular basis, lose games.
Perhaps we're working towards that "good team" tag so we can afford a bad day
victory in the knowledge that we'll be back to "normal" for the next game.
Quite a simple thought process really!
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric B
To: Sutton / Smail
Cc: Leeds List (Post to list)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:39 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] LU Were we good for our victory
Would you rather win on a shitty day, like good teams do, than play well and
lose?
What is going on here? explain why you have these thoughts? :-)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Sutton / Smail <dsm...@dsmail.plus.com>
wrote:
Please somebody tell me we were worth our win tonight against Doncaster.
I couldn't take another "Ipswich" where we were played off the park for
parts of the game but somehow managed a victory.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
