Sadly not that I need to add to Rich's obsession on Becchio - I do have to 
report on TV on AL Jiz right now just mentioned Norwich's need for strikers 
last season and how they brought in.... (mentioned 2 blokes).. neither of them 
Becchio.... poor bastard doesn't even get a mention or even recognised as a 
striker in passing comment by footy pundits.....
 
hey ho......
 
MOT  
 
> From: mgardi...@gardinerlegal.com
> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:03:24 +0000
> Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio Watch
> 
> Rich, retirement is the eventual outcome for all players who do not literally 
> perish on the pitch.
> 
> Michael Gardiner
> San Diego Whites
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Nov 3, 2013, at 4:00 AM, "leedslist-requ...@gn.apc.org" 
> > <leedslist-requ...@gn.apc.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Send Leedslist mailing list submissions to
> >    leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > 
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >    http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >    leedslist-requ...@gn.apc.org
> > 
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >    leedslist-ow...@gn.apc.org
> > 
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Leedslist digest..."
> > 
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >   1. Re: Non LU Becchio Watch (Richard walker)
> >   2. Yoevil (nat...@sky.com)
> >   3. Yoevil - me v Rich (nat...@sky.com)
> >   4. Re: Yoevil (Richard walker)
> >   5. Re: Yoevil - me v Rich (Richard walker)
> >   6. Re: Yoevil (Jim Moran)
> >   7. Non Lu: Becchio (Richard walker)
> >   8. Re: Yoevil (Richard walker)
> >   9. Yoevil - Austin (nat...@sky.com)
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:08:50 +0000
> > From: Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > To: Wayne <ws.callag...@live.co.uk>
> > Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU Becchio Watch
> > Message-ID: <979f58be-058f-40e3-906d-45f24dcdb...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > I'd rather have Ryan Hall. Better player. Both shit though.
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> > 
> >> On 2 Nov 2013, at 19:09, Wayne <ws.callag...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> >> 
> >> I'd rather have him than Ryan Hall..
> >> From: Richard walker 
> >> Sent: Sat, Nov 2, 2013 6:49 PM
> >> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> >> CC:
> >> Subject: [LU] Non LU Becchio Watch
> >> 
> >> Great news for Becchio fans - he made the bench. 
> >> 
> >> Bad news, and this is fairly mystifying, despite being 7-0 down the 
> >> manager didn't think it was worth giving the hotshot striker a go. 
> >> 
> >> Why does he bother turning up ? Surely retirement is the eventual outcome 
> >> to this nightmare for him ? 
> >> 
> >> Sent from my iPad 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> >> Leedslist mailing list 
> >> Info and options: 
> >> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist 
> >> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org 
> >> 
> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> > To: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: [LU] Yoevil
> > Message-ID:
> >    <1383424405.9832.yahoomail...@web171603.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > 
> > ?3 points and a clean sheet - so job done.
> > Yes it was not the prettiest or greatest performance, especially first 
> > half, but we did what we needed to do and deserved the win.
> > We missed Byram as right wing back, albeit Peltier had a decent game, and 
> > then things got even stranger when Warnock went off just before half time 
> > and Pearce ended up as left wing back !
> > The weather was awful with huge gusting winds (perhaps the hardest weather 
> > to play good football in) and then a couple of torrential downpours, but no 
> > sure why we had the coloured ball ?
> > We started brightly and Mowatt again showed he is real class with a great 
> > shot when off balance that the keeper did well to save, then Rody put in a 
> > good cross that Smith only had to touch to open the scoring but somehow he 
> > contrived to hit fresh air and the chance went begging. After that it 
> > reminded me of some of the games when we played a team from a lower league 
> > in cup competitions - Yoevil suddenly realised that we were not that good 
> > and found a bit of confidence and drive and took the game to us. For the 
> > second quarter of the game they were the better team but never really 
> > looked like scoring, on the odd occasion they did open us up the final ball 
> > or the strikers touch let them down.
> > We were a bit grateful to get to half time but that was not, to my mind, 
> > enough excuse for those fans who booed them off at half time - it really 
> > annoys me. We are called 'supporters; and are supposed to support the team! 
> > Yes I know we pay our money etc etc but whilst it is just about excusable 
> > to boo at the end, there really is no point in doing it at half time.
> > 
> > Anyway within a minute of the second half starting we took the lead, Rody 
> > put Ross through and whilst a cross looked to be the better option Ross 
> > fired it past the keeper - a good goal and put me and my mates in our place 
> > (we had been discussing Ross in the pub and pretty much all agreed we had 
> > been conned by him and his agent and should have taken the money) Rody and 
> > Ross then linked up even better 15 mins or so later when a lovely weighted 
> > ball from Rody split the defence and Ross timed his run and slotted it 
> > home. Game over.
> > Blackstock came on for the largely ineffective Smith and did look like a 
> > decent player and was a bit unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. They had 
> > little to offer but did force Kenny into one good save.
> > So like I said at the start job done - not the best game or performance and 
> > it is one of the games you expect to win , ?and we did. Another 2 for Ross 
> > (8? already for the season) and Blackstock looked like he has something to 
> > offer. Rody whilst not quite hitting the heights of the Birmingham game had 
> > ?a good game and was the difference between the teams, when he plays well 
> > he looks a good player and we do well, how he can then turn into a pile of 
> > crap in other games is beyond me. Mowatt continues to impress, and Pearce 
> > stuck to his tasks well. Marius looks big and was no-nonsense a couple of 
> > times, not quite the 'majestic Rolls Royce' that Redfearn talked about but 
> > he may be able to 'do a job'
> > 
> > I don't think we learned anything new - we will probably hover in and 
> > around the play off places and then fall short, but Mcdermott must be given 
> > a few seasons to follow through on his long term plans. 25k shows that the 
> > cheap(er) ticket promotions are working
> > 
> > Great to be back , fit and well (well almost)
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:42:18 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> > To: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: [LU] Yoevil - me v Rich
> > Message-ID:
> >    <1383424938.19616.yahoomail...@web171604.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > 
> > Having just posted my report and then got Rich's in my inbox it was nice to 
> > see that we were pretty much in agreement - the only real disagreement was 
> > re Peltier - Rich said he was poor, I thought that (although he was no Sam 
> > Byram) he did quite well
> > 
> > That apart ,we both saw the same game, one in which quality was at a 
> > premium and one in which we were slightly better than the very poor 
> > opposition. We agreed that Austin was our man of the match and Ross took 
> > his goals well.
> > 
> > I tend to ?be less critical and more forgiving than Rich but more often 
> > than not we do agree with ?how we played and how the game panned out etc.
> > 
> > It is always good to see that someone sees the game the same way - it 
> > almost makes me think that i got it right
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:42:54 +0000
> > From: Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> > Cc: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil
> > Message-ID: <4a1e67f5-95a4-4738-b850-0f3c59256...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > Cheers Dave. Glad you are feeling better. The boos at half-time caused a 
> > bit of anger in the NE stand. We're old, grumpy gits but we never boo our 
> > team.
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> > 
> >> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:33, "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 3 points and a clean sheet - so job done.
> >> Yes it was not the prettiest or greatest performance, especially first 
> >> half, but we did what we needed to do and deserved the win.
> >> We missed Byram as right wing back, albeit Peltier had a decent game, and 
> >> then things got even stranger when Warnock went off just before half time 
> >> and Pearce ended up as left wing back !
> >> The weather was awful with huge gusting winds (perhaps the hardest weather 
> >> to play good football in) and then a couple of torrential downpours, but 
> >> no sure why we had the coloured ball ?
> >> We started brightly and Mowatt again showed he is real class with a great 
> >> shot when off balance that the keeper did well to save, then Rody put in a 
> >> good cross that Smith only had to touch to open the scoring but somehow he 
> >> contrived to hit fresh air and the chance went begging. After that it 
> >> reminded me of some of the games when we played a team from a lower league 
> >> in cup competitions - Yoevil suddenly realised that we were not that good 
> >> and found a bit of confidence and drive and took the game to us. For the 
> >> second quarter of the game they were the better team but never really 
> >> looked like scoring, on the odd occasion they did open us up the final 
> >> ball or the strikers touch let them down.
> >> We were a bit grateful to get to half time but that was not, to my mind, 
> >> enough excuse for those fans who booed them off at half time - it really 
> >> annoys me. We are called 'supporters; and are supposed to support the 
> >> team! Yes I know we pay our money etc etc but whilst it is just about 
> >> excusable to boo at the end, there really is no point in doing it at half 
> >> time.
> >> 
> >> Anyway within a minute of the second half starting we took the lead, Rody 
> >> put Ross through and whilst a cross looked to be the better option Ross 
> >> fired it past the keeper - a good goal and put me and my mates in our 
> >> place (we had been discussing Ross in the pub and pretty much all agreed 
> >> we had been conned by him and his agent and should have taken the money) 
> >> Rody and Ross then linked up even better 15 mins or so later when a lovely 
> >> weighted ball from Rody split the defence and Ross timed his run and 
> >> slotted it home. Game over.
> >> Blackstock came on for the largely ineffective Smith and did look like a 
> >> decent player and was a bit unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. They had 
> >> little to offer but did force Kenny into one good save.
> >> So like I said at the start job done - not the best game or performance 
> >> and it is one of the games you expect to win ,  and we did. Another 2 for 
> >> Ross (8? already for the season) and Blackstock looked like he has 
> >> something to offer. Rody whilst not quite hitting the heights of the 
> >> Birmingham game had  a good game and was the difference between the teams, 
> >> when he plays well he looks a good player and we do well, how he can then 
> >> turn into a pile of crap in other games is beyond me. Mowatt continues to 
> >> impress, and Pearce stuck to his tasks well. Marius looks big and was 
> >> no-nonsense a couple of times, not quite the 'majestic Rolls Royce' that 
> >> Redfearn talked about but he may be able to 'do a job'
> >> 
> >> I don't think we learned anything new - we will probably hover in and 
> >> around the play off places and then fall short, but Mcdermott must be 
> >> given a few seasons to follow through on his long term plans. 25k shows 
> >> that the cheap(er) ticket promotions are working
> >> 
> >> Great to be back , fit and well (well almost)
> >> 
> >> Dave
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >> 
> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:44:35 +0000
> > From: Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> > Cc: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil - me v Rich
> > Message-ID: <7f7deb64-8c67-420e-9841-9cc02fc22...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > I would accept that I was comparing Peltier to Byram. I was really pissed 
> > off that Byram want playing today. I love watching that lad play. 
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> > 
> >> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:42, "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Having just posted my report and then got Rich's in my inbox it was nice 
> >> to see that we were pretty much in agreement - the only real disagreement 
> >> was re Peltier - Rich said he was poor, I thought that (although he was no 
> >> Sam Byram) he did quite well
> >> 
> >> That apart ,we both saw the same game, one in which quality was at a 
> >> premium and one in which we were slightly better than the very poor 
> >> opposition. We agreed that Austin was our man of the match and Ross took 
> >> his goals well.
> >> 
> >> I tend to  be less critical and more forgiving than Rich but more often 
> >> than not we do agree with  how we played and how the game panned out etc.
> >> 
> >> It is always good to see that someone sees the game the same way - it 
> >> almost makes me think that i got it right
> >> 
> >> Dave
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >> 
> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:57:34 +0000
> > From: Jim Moran <j...@jimmoran.co.uk>
> > To: Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > Cc: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil
> > Message-ID: <639dc52f-fdfd-4f89-89f6-54152efb5...@jimmoran.co.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > Thankfully I missed the boos as I was busy queuing for beer in what must be 
> > renamed the Becchio bar - completely ineffective at doing the job. How I 
> > can go down for a beer on 40 mins and not be served until 5 mins before KO 
> > is beyond me. Our catering facilities are a complete fucking joke. 
> > 
> > Can't disagree with your or Dave's reports. We had 5 centre halves playing 
> > today (I think?) when Warnock went off so no wonder we struggled against 
> > the second worst team I've seen this season. 
> > 
> > Austin man of the match by a mile. McCormack I thought was poor, apart from 
> > the two excellent finishes. 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> >> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:42, Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Cheers Dave. Glad you are feeling better. The boos at half-time caused a 
> >> bit of anger in the NE stand. We're old, grumpy gits but we never boo our 
> >> team.
> >> 
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >> 
> >>> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:33, "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> 3 points and a clean sheet - so job done.
> >>> Yes it was not the prettiest or greatest performance, especially first 
> >>> half, but we did what we needed to do and deserved the win.
> >>> We missed Byram as right wing back, albeit Peltier had a decent game, and 
> >>> then things got even stranger when Warnock went off just before half time 
> >>> and Pearce ended up as left wing back !
> >>> The weather was awful with huge gusting winds (perhaps the hardest 
> >>> weather to play good football in) and then a couple of torrential 
> >>> downpours, but no sure why we had the coloured ball ?
> >>> We started brightly and Mowatt again showed he is real class with a great 
> >>> shot when off balance that the keeper did well to save, then Rody put in 
> >>> a good cross that Smith only had to touch to open the scoring but somehow 
> >>> he contrived to hit fresh air and the chance went begging. After that it 
> >>> reminded me of some of the games when we played a team from a lower 
> >>> league in cup competitions - Yoevil suddenly realised that we were not 
> >>> that good and found a bit of confidence and drive and took the game to 
> >>> us. For the second quarter of the game they were the better team but 
> >>> never really looked like scoring, on the odd occasion they did open us up 
> >>> the final ball or the strikers touch let them down.
> >>> We were a bit grateful to get to half time but that was not, to my mind, 
> >>> enough excuse for those fans who booed them off at half time - it really 
> >>> annoys me. We are called 'supporters; and are supposed to support the 
> >>> team! Yes I know we pay our money etc etc but whilst it is just about 
> >>> excusable to boo at the end, there really is no point in doing it at half 
> >>> time.
> >>> 
> >>> Anyway within a minute of the second half starting we took the lead, Rody 
> >>> put Ross through and whilst a cross looked to be the better option Ross 
> >>> fired it past the keeper - a good goal and put me and my mates in our 
> >>> place (we had been discussing Ross in the pub and pretty much all agreed 
> >>> we had been conned by him and his agent and should have taken the money) 
> >>> Rody and Ross then linked up even better 15 mins or so later when a 
> >>> lovely weighted ball from Rody split the defence and Ross timed his run 
> >>> and slotted it home. Game over.
> >>> Blackstock came on for the largely ineffective Smith and did look like a 
> >>> decent player and was a bit unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. They 
> >>> had little to offer but did force Kenny into one good save.
> >>> So like I said at the start job done - not the best game or performance 
> >>> and it is one of the games you expect to win ,  and we did. Another 2 for 
> >>> Ross (8? already for the season) and Blackstock looked like he has 
> >>> something to offer. Rody whilst not quite hitting the heights of the 
> >>> Birmingham game had  a good game and was the difference between the 
> >>> teams, when he plays well he looks a good player and we do well, how he 
> >>> can then turn into a pile of crap in other games is beyond me. Mowatt 
> >>> continues to impress, and Pearce stuck to his tasks well. Marius looks 
> >>> big and was no-nonsense a couple of times, not quite the 'majestic Rolls 
> >>> Royce' that Redfearn talked about but he may be able to 'do a job'
> >>> 
> >>> I don't think we learned anything new - we will probably hover in and 
> >>> around the play off places and then fall short, but Mcdermott must be 
> >>> given a few seasons to follow through on his long term plans. 25k shows 
> >>> that the cheap(er) ticket promotions are working
> >>> 
> >>> Great to be back , fit and well (well almost)
> >>> 
> >>> Dave
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leedslist mailing list
> >>> Info and options: 
> >>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >>> 
> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >> 
> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:50:42 +0000
> > From: Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > To: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: [LU] Non Lu: Becchio
> > Message-ID: <da1b0312-0ee4-49e8-b057-519daafbe...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > Becchio must be really hoping that Houghton gets the chop, however who will 
> > he want in ? I'm not sure Norwich will go for .? Grayson ?,  Mcallister ?
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 09:17:28 +0000
> > From: Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > To: Jim Moran <j...@jimmoran.co.uk>
> > Cc: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil
> > Message-ID: <db94e317-e0c3-4ad9-a08f-2fd9fd9e1...@yahoo.co.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > 
> > I missed Macca out on my scores but you'd have to give him 8 , joint MOTM 
> > with Rudy. I know what you mean about is ineffectiveness at times but at 
> > the end of the day he has that bit extra which most of our current lot 
> > don't. 
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> > 
> >> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:57, Jim Moran <j...@jimmoran.co.uk> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Thankfully I missed the boos as I was busy queuing for beer in what must 
> >> be renamed the Becchio bar - completely ineffective at doing the job. How 
> >> I can go down for a beer on 40 mins and not be served until 5 mins before 
> >> KO is beyond me. Our catering facilities are a complete fucking joke. 
> >> 
> >> Can't disagree with your or Dave's reports. We had 5 centre halves playing 
> >> today (I think?) when Warnock went off so no wonder we struggled against 
> >> the second worst team I've seen this season. 
> >> 
> >> Austin man of the match by a mile. McCormack I thought was poor, apart 
> >> from the two excellent finishes. 
> >> 
> >> --
> >> 
> >>> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:42, Richard walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers Dave. Glad you are feeling better. The boos at half-time caused a 
> >>> bit of anger in the NE stand. We're old, grumpy gits but we never boo our 
> >>> team.
> >>> 
> >>> Sent from my iPad
> >>> 
> >>>> On 2 Nov 2013, at 20:33, "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 3 points and a clean sheet - so job done.
> >>>> Yes it was not the prettiest or greatest performance, especially first 
> >>>> half, but we did what we needed to do and deserved the win.
> >>>> We missed Byram as right wing back, albeit Peltier had a decent game, 
> >>>> and then things got even stranger when Warnock went off just before half 
> >>>> time and Pearce ended up as left wing back !
> >>>> The weather was awful with huge gusting winds (perhaps the hardest 
> >>>> weather to play good football in) and then a couple of torrential 
> >>>> downpours, but no sure why we had the coloured ball ?
> >>>> We started brightly and Mowatt again showed he is real class with a 
> >>>> great shot when off balance that the keeper did well to save, then Rody 
> >>>> put in a good cross that Smith only had to touch to open the scoring but 
> >>>> somehow he contrived to hit fresh air and the chance went begging. After 
> >>>> that it reminded me of some of the games when we played a team from a 
> >>>> lower league in cup competitions - Yoevil suddenly realised that we were 
> >>>> not that good and found a bit of confidence and drive and took the game 
> >>>> to us. For the second quarter of the game they were the better team but 
> >>>> never really looked like scoring, on the odd occasion they did open us 
> >>>> up the final ball or the strikers touch let them down.
> >>>> We were a bit grateful to get to half time but that was not, to my mind, 
> >>>> enough excuse for those fans who booed them off at half time - it really 
> >>>> annoys me. We are called 'supporters; and are supposed to support the 
> >>>> team! Yes I know we pay our money etc etc but whilst it is just about 
> >>>> excusable to boo at the end, there really is no point in doing it at 
> >>>> half time.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Anyway within a minute of the second half starting we took the lead, 
> >>>> Rody put Ross through and whilst a cross looked to be the better option 
> >>>> Ross fired it past the keeper - a good goal and put me and my mates in 
> >>>> our place (we had been discussing Ross in the pub and pretty much all 
> >>>> agreed we had been conned by him and his agent and should have taken the 
> >>>> money) Rody and Ross then linked up even better 15 mins or so later when 
> >>>> a lovely weighted ball from Rody split the defence and Ross timed his 
> >>>> run and slotted it home. Game over.
> >>>> Blackstock came on for the largely ineffective Smith and did look like a 
> >>>> decent player and was a bit unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. They 
> >>>> had little to offer but did force Kenny into one good save.
> >>>> So like I said at the start job done - not the best game or performance 
> >>>> and it is one of the games you expect to win ,  and we did. Another 2 
> >>>> for Ross (8? already for the season) and Blackstock looked like he has 
> >>>> something to offer. Rody whilst not quite hitting the heights of the 
> >>>> Birmingham game had  a good game and was the difference between the 
> >>>> teams, when he plays well he looks a good player and we do well, how he 
> >>>> can then turn into a pile of crap in other games is beyond me. Mowatt 
> >>>> continues to impress, and Pearce stuck to his tasks well. Marius looks 
> >>>> big and was no-nonsense a couple of times, not quite the 'majestic Rolls 
> >>>> Royce' that Redfearn talked about but he may be able to 'do a job'
> >>>> 
> >>>> I don't think we learned anything new - we will probably hover in and 
> >>>> around the play off places and then fall short, but Mcdermott must be 
> >>>> given a few seasons to follow through on his long term plans. 25k shows 
> >>>> that the cheap(er) ticket promotions are working
> >>>> 
> >>>> Great to be back , fit and well (well almost)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Dave
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leedslist mailing list
> >>>> Info and options: 
> >>>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >>>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >>>> 
> >>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leedslist mailing list
> >>> Info and options: 
> >>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >>> 
> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:15:26 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> > To: leeds list <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> > Subject: [LU] Yoevil - Austin
> > Message-ID:
> >    <1383477326.85151.yahoomail...@web171604.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > 
> > Just watched the highlights on the Football League show (NOT FL72 or 
> > whatever stupid rebranding Sky have given it)
> > They showed 5 bits of action
> > Rody - takes it off one of them near their corner flag and gives it to 
> > Mowatt - lovely shot with outside of his boot, saved
> > Rody - bursts down the wing leaving 3 players in his wake and puts in a 
> > lovely cross - Smith somehow manages to miss the ball otherwise a certain 
> > goal
> > Rody - gets ball in his own half and takes it forward then passes to Ross 
> > just inside of the box and he fires home
> > Rody - beats a man and turns towards their goal and puts a lovely ball 
> > through to Ross who slotted home
> > 
> > Just before 2nd goal -they had a long range free kick that was probably 
> > going over put Kenny tipped over just in case
> > 
> > That shows how dynamic and great Rodolph Austin can be and then in other 
> > games his touch and passing is woeful and you wonder how he even made it as 
> > a footballer !
> > If we can get the level of performance out of him that we saw at Leicester 
> > away and now Brum and Yoevil at home then we have a chance of the 
> > play-offs, if we get the Austin that, by all accounts was terrible at 
> > Hudds, then we will be bottom half.
> > My concern is that we all seem to agree that Brum and Yeovil were both 
> > awful on the day - is Rody one of those 'flat track bullies' who only shows 
> > against poor opposition ?
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leedslist mailing list
> > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > 
> > MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> > 
> > 
> > End of Leedslist Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4
> > ****************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> 
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
                                          
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Reply via email to