In this sense doesn't "sub" mean "derived from". I dont know. I looked it up and got this 2 things:
"a taxonomic category that ranks below species, usually a fairly permanent geographically isolated race." but then again I also found what you said. So lets put some context into this: Are you seriously trying to tell me this glorious leader (he seems to have a religious touch to some of you lot and can do no wrong) was trying to portrait the chinese in a good light in context of what he said? And what about what he sais after the massacre in Norway? I d be keen to hear your defence on that one. honestly, people in Norway took it as what it was: a retarded comment from an idiot that used to play in a shit band. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rick Duniec <ri...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > In this sense doesn't "sub" mean "derived from". > If you really must indulge in this bollox then it could easily be argued > that sub in this sense is necessarily more advanced as the main group came > before it. > Of course, it really means none of this bollox. > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org John 'Grampa' Sykes Rest In Peace old lad 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013 MARCHING ON TOGETHER
