Reading the real test as they are team with new manager new ideas new players like us who are starting from scratch.
Not too bothered by Brighton result as they are result of 2/3 years of stability, decent backing for manager and a couple of years of being there or thereabouts. Newcastle. Already been said. They are a prem squad who where mismanaged and have spent a fortune reinforcing. Sent from my iPhone > On 12 Dec 2016, at 12:00, "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> wrote: > > I agree that Green has been a real disappointment and a weak link. I would > give Silvestri a chance, he had his faults but it will be a lot better for > him with Bartley and Janson in front of him rather than Bellusci and > Bamba.Moscowhite on twitter (one of the square ball writers) did a really > good explanation of the first penalty and Greens massive part in it , and has > done screen shots to explain how Green was at fault > Friday was a bad day at the office all round: for me Taylor came out with > credit as did Vierra but the rest all had a bad game and were second best. > We have the chance in the next 5 days to get things back on track starting > with Reading tomorrow- so far the top two teams (Newcastle and Brighton) have > shown why they are top two and beat us reasonably easily ( both with 'help' > from Green) so we need to show tomorrow that we are a genuine top 6 team and > beat them.Follow that with a victory over Brentford on Saturday and things > will look good againWe need O'Kane and Bridcutt back as soon as possible and > we need the crowd to keep on believing (it will be interesting to see how > many turn up tomorrow and Saturday after the big crowds v Newcastle and Villa > - have fans returned because they believe or is it that they were lured in by > the opposition ?) > Looking forward to finding out if we can do it and have some optimism that we > will indeed get 6 pts from the two games (I fancy Roofe to bag a goal in each > game) > Dave > > From: Phill Shields <phillshie...@hotmail.com> > To: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>; "leedslist@gn.apc.org" > <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Sent: Monday, 12 December 2016, 10:59 > Subject: Re: [LU] FT Brighton 2 Leeds 0 > > Am I the only one who thought it telling that Brighton's whole focus was to > put balls around Rob Green at any opportunity because of his flapping? I > blame him for both goals, he simply will not come and deal with balls > anywhere near the 6 yard box. > > > I suggest that Monk either gives Silvestri a chance or brings in an extra > keeper in January. Green was on the floor before either penalty takers > touched the ball on Friday, he is useless. > > > I realise we are still a project and this is my only criticism of Monk. If > Green remains in goal rest of the season I cannot see us making the play-offs. > > > MOT > > > ________________________________ > From: Leedslist <leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> > Sent: 11 December 2016 16:01 > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] FT Brighton 2 Leeds 0 > > Agreed, John, We made a decent fist of it in the second half even with 10 > men and the 2nd penalty was soft. Fans in good voice throughout the match > and deservedly cheered the team off at the end. I was there in feb when we > were 4 down by half time, even this performance was light years ahead, we > passed the ball well, got into them throughout and made it hard for them. > 5th place flatters us, but this is a long term project and we are still > without 3 of our best players. > > Best of all, 2000 Leeds fans signing a Wham! song for 20 minutes :) > > ttfn > > Richard > >> >> Appalling but fuck it I still believe we have to get behind the team and >> bollocks to the rest! >> >> Sent from the North >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Leedslist -- The Unofficial Leeds United Email List - > GreenNet<http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist> > mailman.greennet.org.uk > This is the original (founded 1992) and 100% unofficial Leeds United Internet > Mailing List Leedslist has no connection with Leeds United Football Club, or > any other body > > > >> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org >> >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Leedslist -- The Unofficial Leeds United Email List - > GreenNet<http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist> > mailman.greennet.org.uk > This is the original (founded 1992) and 100% unofficial Leeds United Internet > Mailing List Leedslist has no connection with Leeds United Football Club, or > any other body > > > > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER
