Re: [LU] LU: Coca Cola player

[DAVID NATTAN]

There is certainly a "southern bias" though. Brighton last time and the 3 'finalists' Brentford, Oxford and winners Southampton. Could all be a co-incidence of course but then again..........

Surely coca cola should award us something for getting most votes both times, the idea of the competition is presumably an advertising one, the aim being to get the brand name to as many folk as possible ?

Dave

Simon Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Searching my email for "fixed" resulted in:

Verner Hanna wrote:
> No it was fixed and Brighton won it. As I was told by a mate who
> works for Coca Cola when the scam began. I'm still voting though to
> make sure we end up top again. My mate reckons it's QPR or Palace
> this time to win, he'll confirm when he's sure.

So, not fixed or the mole was discovered and fed bad info... you decide!

- Si

Mark Humphries wrote:

> Someone on the list said it was fixed, but as far as I remember they
> didn’t say who would win this time.
> -------------------------
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *J Moran
> *Sent:* 02 May 2006 10:51 *To:* Brian Hamilton;
> leedslist@list.zetnet.co.uk *Subject:* Re: [LU] LU: Coca Cola player
>
> Southampton, which I believe was predicted by someone on here months
> ago.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Brian Hamilton
>
>
> Missed the actual result but it was between Brentford, Southampton
> and Oxford United - drawn at random despite Leeds fans voting nearly
> as many times as all the other teams added together


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
Leedslist@list.zetnet.co.uk
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist