Is anyone else a little confused about this alleged appeal for Crainey's second yellow card?
My understanding has always been that you cannot appeal anything that a ref has given on what he sees at the time, unless it's a straight red card for violent conduct, when you can appeal. So even if Crainey got a straight red, I don't think he could appeal because it wasn't for violent conduct, and there is no chance of an appeal for a yellow card. It interesting that story has come direct from Crainey, and not an official source, and it's based on the ref agreeing to look at this incident again. I'm not too surprised a player isn't necessarily aware of the intricacies of appeals, but if the ref did agree to look at it again I think its quite telling on him that he doesn't even know the rules of the game! Assuming I am right of course.. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
