----- Original Message ----- > Someone posted that information to the list, following on from a posting > (by > a LUST person?) on WACCOE.
I'm not sure which thread or which posting on Waccoe you are referring to. I'll try to get an explanation if you can give me this in context. > Yes WACCOE is full of shit, but usually anything like this to do with LUST > is corrected immediately on here and I don't recall seeing any such > correction. Are you saying the errors on Waccoe are corrected on this list or have I misunderstood you ? > Why the smoke & mirrors in your reply to my original post? I'll try to answer if you can be more specific. > My original post was all to do with the fact that LUST hadn't signed the > NDA > and therefore ruled themselves out of the bidding, all you (or anyone else > had to say) was they did sign the NDA. I thought that the Trust had made it clear that it stopped its original bid process because the new circumstances did not meet the business model and business requirements of the Trusts primary backer. > Instead that response gets muddied with loads of my crap to do with Stubbs > and the Krasner negotiations which, if the NDA was signed, are irrelevant. The KPMG non disclosure is hardly relevant to the Stubbs/Krasner exchanges or have I missed the point ? _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
