----- Original Message ----- > Why on earth would LUST not sign the NDA?
Lots of reasons but this is irrelevant. The KPMG NDA was signed by the chairman of the Trust. The clubs NDA was not produced or signed because it became irrelevant. > It smacks of politicks, the goal is to own the club, does it really matter > if you have to play Bates game until that happens?? Or do they want to be > seen to be the saviours of LUFC or be seen to be big boys around the > table? AFAIK The Trust has done everything possible to acknowledge to both Mr Bates and KPMG that they are anything but big boys at the table. In fact this was something of a mutually shared joke between the Trust and Mr Bates. There is no pretence involved, just the stark reality. > On the one hand we are told that LUST are genuine contenders and have some > smart business brains behind them, then we are told this. but you were not told this > NDAs are commonplace in business, which is what I thought people were > demanding of football (to be 'proper' businesses)? > And they wonder why Bates et al aren't interested in talking to them. What makes you think this ? > By their politicking are they doing a Stubbs? > The Ego's have landed. I think you must be looking into a mirror. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
