Mark H wrote: > Were those my words? I thought I was talking about the offers for the > creditors, not the offers as a whole, and I said that Bates > offer was 'no > worse' than at least 3 of the others > > All based upon the news around the time that 3 of the other > bids had offered > the same 1p in the £ as Bates offer, and only the Morris bid > offered more > for the creditors. >
So do you admit that you were wrong? Do you admit that my interpretation of information in the public domain was more accurate better than yours? > I > never thought > for a second that he had the 'club at heart', Are you calling him a liar? He stated on Sunday that he had the "club at heart", are you saying that he hasn't? > although I do > believe he is a > football man and for him to succeed Leeds United would need > to succeed on > the pitch. I don't know how many times I have to say this before it penetrates your skull BUT success for Bates is not synonymous with success for Leeds. Success for Leeds may equal success for Bates, but the converse is not necessarily true. Paul _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
