which to me sounds like justice should it happen! Very rarely in deals like
this does the villain of the piece get what, morally-speaking (and please let's
leave the argument over morals till a later date) they deserve.
I still think new depths are there to be plumbed re LUFCs existence.
John
RickD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The true significance of a section 216 breach, as I understand it, is that
the directors of the new company can be held personally liable for debts
incurred by the new company.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
