oh ffk sake. you arent all going to start trading conflicting newspaper artciles now.
ner ner, my paper's better than yours >From: "Paul Cundell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [LU] New statement from Harvey (was: Public boll*x) >Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:37:05 +0100 > >Mark H wrote: > > > > " We are in daily contact with the League and are now pushing them to > > schedule a date for the board meeting as we know they now have the > > information they were waiting for from KPMG and have had time > > to consider > > it." > > > > See that Paul - "daily contact". So, what do you base your > > 'took the club > > so long to chase' line on? Oh that's right, a ridiculous > > conspiracy theory > > that the club don't actually want the GS back at the moment. > > > >Interesting that Mark, considering yesterday the YP published this: - > >http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=4883&ArticleID=305 >3533 > >" As of last night, however, no new date had been confirmed so Leeds >contacted the League in order to find out what is happening. > >United chief executive Shaun Harvey said: "The club have been in contact >with the Football League to seek clarification when the Football League >board will reconvene to consider the club's application to transfer the >share. We are awaiting a response." " > >Which gives the impression that until July 23rd at least the club hadn't >been in contact with the FL on a daily basis. If it had been otherwise the >story yesterday would have read "The club have been in daily contact since >the sale by KPMG..." >Harvey now says he's in daily contact so that could mean 3 phone calls in >total, one for each day this week. Harvey clearly says that he is NOW >pushing them for a date, which infers that he hasn't been in the past - >else >again he would have said "We have been regularly pushing them for a >date...." - I'm sure a man of your intelligence can see the distinction. >I'm not saying the club don't want the GS back - that is your own inference >- I am saying that perhaps the club don't put the same urgency behind >getting it back as you seem to think it demands. > >Paul > > >_______________________________________________ >the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators >accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. >Leedslist mailing list >[email protected] >http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org _________________________________________________________________ Got a favourite clothes shop, bar or restaurant? Share your local knowledge http://www.backofmyhand.com _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
