> > Paul - your bias know no bounds > Pete, if you are looking for bias without bounds look no further than the mirror.
> "Pete, sweetie, Bates' offer was half that of Redbus' offer - > most had an > inkling that this was the case, which is why there was such > consternation. > It only became a better deal, initially, for the creditors > when that totally > unconnected company that Mark Taylor (a luafc director) > represents wiped off > £17M for no other reason than they like cuddly ken. > Even then Bates' offer is only 0.9p in the £1 better than Redbus'. " > > > In your own words: > "it became a better deal" > "Bates' offer is...better than Redbus'" Correct, I typed it so I know it's correct - you stated you expected listers to admit they were wrong. I was illustrating why they wouldn't be admitting any such thing. There's no bias in the stated facts as far as I can see. > > So QUITE CLEARLY Bates had the better offer, KPMG did their > job - AGAIN We still have not got the golden share therefore KPMG did NOT do their job. IF they had sold Bates a football club entitled to play in the FL, then they would have sold a going concern. The club cannot be considered a going concern until Bates convinces the FL that we are indeed an exceptional circumstance. Not an easy job. > > Time to let go Paul - just let it go........ Let go of what? The club? I note you make no comment on the rest of my equally valid points in that posting, I assume that is because you agree with them. Paul _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
