>>True I did make (not in quite so many words) those  accusations...but you
missed the point, that what I objected to was Mark  B's  telling Rick and the
Trust, not only what the topic of their  letter should be but, exactly what
the wording of their letter should  be,<<
 
 
I did not TELL him what the wording should be. He can word it however he  
likes. He can choose to ignore me completely. I simply gave my opinion as to  
what I believe would be the most likely negotiating stance to take, based on my 
 
own experience of negotiating for things.
 
Why should you "object" to that?
 
 
>>All that ahead of having, at least the courtesy to follow Rick's  invitation
and see just exactly what was being asked before jumping to  conclusions and
being bombastic.<<
 
 
Why should I blindly follow an invitation without knowing what it is? How  
much moey have you given to those Nigerians?
 

>>Making demands of  an entity you've criticized constantly,  does seem a
little disingenuous; however I'm sure the Trust will welcome any  genuine
offers of assistance, form both of you, in their campaign on topic we  can
all be on the same side with..<<
 
 
As I said, I'm prepared to do whatever will help, providing I believe it to  
be the right thing to do. If the trust wanted to send 'Bates out' leaflets  
everywhere, then I would not participate. Not because (as you believe) I ama 
fan 
 of bates - but because it would be counter-productive.
 
Mark
 
 








   
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org 

Reply via email to