Er... can't it be both? HMRC spiked Boston's CVA so they couldn't pay all their football debts...
- Si Nigel Holcroft wrote: > All that aside, please note that Bates, himself clearly states, that the > challenge, from HMRC was based on the voting rights of 3 entities (the off > shores, Taylor & Yorkshire Radio)) and while he goes on to imply that it is > really a disguised attack on the football creditors rule, that is his > interpretation alone.. The evidence he uses to support that interpretation > is flimsy. For the "reasoned argument" to garner enough votes to overturn > the 15 points penalty, the voters must accept that implication rather than > the hard copy of the filing itself. > > The fact that he apparently gave the Revenue what they asked for, in the > shape of extra money to match what was being paid to the football creditors, > surely means that it was not the issue they really cared about. .. > > They seem to want Bates, whether for his past tax dealings, in general or > for his, perceived fraudulent manipulation of this process... Given what > has transpired since the challenge, the latter seems to be the most likely, > logical reason for the taxman to pursue the challenge to a dead CVA.. He > opened a door, for them and they are jack-booting there way right on through > it. The best laid plans..... > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
