I was really doing my best not to leave lurk mode and I know what I 
am about to say will prompt 900 indignant messages from Mark 
Humphries and Luisa (which evidently I will not read), BUT I have to 
say I agree with the Southend supporter. Some of you need to get a 
life and stop it already with all this boo hoo hoo, everybody hates 
us, what a terrible injustice rubbish.

I have had a letter printed in the Fiver (for which I received a very 
nice smiley T-shirt), so I am evidently qualified to comment, thusly:

As Malcolm X would say, this is nothing but the chickens coming home 
to roost. If you have a chairman who tries to drive a coach and 
horses through the rules and sh*t on everybody who gets in the way 
then sooner or later you're going to pay the cost. Let's be serious, 
apart from Ken's toyboys on the list, we all know that the CVA was a 
stitch-up and that Astor are not unrelated to Bates. This, along with 
Bates' lifetime history of extremely dodgy deals, is the reason HMRC 
was against the CVA. Contrary to what people have being saying, there 
is no evidence that the CVA was legal, since it got abandoned before 
the case got to court. Even if it was, it was so evidently dishonest 
to have put everybody's backs up and so asking for sympathetic 
treatment now is ridiculously naive.

The same goes for the supposed 25-point penalty. What Ken did was to 
take us into admin when we were already down. You can argue all you 
like about whether this was within the letter of the law, but it was 
obviously contrary to the spirit, which is that if you go into admin 
you suffer some sort of negative consequence. Our first ten-point 
penalty was meaningless, because Ken engineered it so that when it 
was incurred a 0-point penalty or a 3,000-point penalty would have 
made no difference. What sort of message would the FL be sending if 
it allowed this? Anybody who suffers relegation can stuff its 
creditors with impunity because we'll just notch up the points 
deduction with the relegation total where it makes sod all 
difference. Again, if you try to play right up against the limit of 
the rules, you might get away with it, but you can't expect sympathy 
if it all goes pear-shaped.

So yes, let's all start organizing boycotts against those responsible 
for the terrible injustices suffered by the club. Namely:

- Not putting in any meaningful funds, taking out a top-notch salary, 
selling off anything that moves, saddling us with all sorts of debts 
that nobody knows where they came from and then taking us into 
administration (thus making fools of all those who argued that 
getting Bates was better than administration, because his funds would 
save us). Responsible: Ken Bates

- Putting in a psychopath with no management nouse who took us 
straight down to Division 3, pausing only briefly to embarrass us 
with such wonderful episodes as the leaked team sheet for which the 
player responsible was never going to play for the club again, except 
that nobody knew who it was (thus making fools of all those who said 
Ken had a point to prove and would thus take us back to the Premier). 
Responsible: Ken Bates

- Slashing attendances by putting up prices to almost Chelsea levels 
for sub-standard football and alienating vast sections of the club's 
support with his lack of respect for our heritage and his 
heavy-handed vendettas (thus making fools of everyone who argued that 
Ken had top-class management skills, or maybe they were fools 
already?). Responsible: Ken Bates

- F*cking the club's creditors, with an insulting CVA, passed in 
highly dodgy circumstances but then abandoned in highly dodgy 
circumstances, refusing to get out of the way and let someone less 
problematic take over and successfully courting everybody's hatred to 
the point that nobody in power was prepared to do us too many 
favours. Responsible: Ken Bates

The worst thing about this is that Bates' fans now tell us we are now 
supposed to rally around the club, ie. Bates. Well you can count me 
out. If I was still in the UK, I would keep on going to matches, home 
and away, sing my heart out for the lads, but at the same time make 
it abundantly clear that Bates is not welcome at my club and make it 
as unpleasant as possible for him, so that he sods off ASAP. If 
Oldham fans managed to drive him out, then I don't see why we can't, 
because we are evidently not going anywhere but further down with him 
in charge.

Peace,
Pete H

At 15:15 09/08/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Matthew Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 5:24 PM
>Subject: Re: [LU] Appeal Lost - ffs, stop whingeing about it!!
>
>
>>My southend fan mate reckons we deserve it and should stop whinging 
>>because its going to get a lot worse for us
>
>Yebbut I bet he's never had a letter printed in The Fiver, eh?
>
>- Sean


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org 

Reply via email to