Ah ok, that might be the case. It didn't surprise me he was on our side as he is a relatively new chairman and brand new to the football league. He isn't part of any old boys network.
By the way, is the pc I built you all those years back still going strong? :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 August 2007 18:55 > To: Mark Humphries; 'Brendan Osborne'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LU] Teams who voted FOR us - no idea if this list is > valid > > I may be wrong but I saw that clip and I think he was the one chairman > who > did not get there in time to vote. Think he said that if he had been > there > in time he "would" have backed Leeds > > Richard > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Humphries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Brendan Osborne'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 9:38 AM > Subject: Re: [LU] Teams who voted FOR us - no idea if this list is > valid > > > > Sorry if this has already been posted, working through emails at the > mo, > > but > > last night on SSN they spoke to some chairmen after the vote and > Milan > > Mandaric clearly had sympathy with Leeds - he said that the > punishment was > > way too harsh and unfair on Leeds. > > > > As Leicester isn't in the list below then either the list is > incomplete, > > the > > list is wrong, or he still voted against us despite saying nice > things! > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brendan Osborne > >> Sent: 09 August 2007 16:18 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [LU] Teams who voted FOR us - no idea if this list is valid > >> > >> > >> Read this on Football 365 forum, I don't vouch for the validity of > this > >> - the teams that voted for us are (allegedly)..... > >> > >> > >> Bradford CityBurnleyColchester UnitedDarlingtonGillinghamIpswich > >> TownNottingham ForestPlymouth ArgyleQueens Park RangersSheffield > >> UnitedSheffield WednesdayStockport CountyStoke CitySwindon > >> TownWatfordWrexham > >> > >> Which means that Ridsdale concurred with the Football League (if > this > >> list is accurate). > >> > >> > >> Ossie > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> Discover the new Windows Vista > >> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en- > US&form=QBRE > >> _______________________________________________ > >> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > >> administrators accept no liability for the personal views and > opinions > >> of contributors. > >> Leedslist mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > >> Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators > > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of > contributors. > > Leedslist mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.10/943 - Release Date: > > 08/08/2007 17:38 > > > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
