What you are forgetting dear fellow is that us Brits whilst having a 
superior nature do like to give those less fortunate than ourselves their 
time in the spotlight.

I could have been taking the comment at face value, ie, that you are indeed 
a merkin, I merely commented on not wanting to be one (BTW in my neck of the 
woods descendents of our former colony are known as moronicans).

Also reading back through the email I took the Oxford English Dictionary 
version of wry - Contorted in disappointment.

Toodle pip

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil

> Now THERE'S a man bites?dog story...a Brit missing an American's wry 
> humor.? ;-)
>
> MAG
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 9:31 am
> Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil
>
>
> Hmmm, sense of humour eh, well, I for one wouldn't really like to be a 
> merkin as it means something completely different on this side of the 
> water.?
> ?
> Cheers?
> ?
> Chris?
> ?
> ----- Original Message -----?
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
> To: <[email protected]>?
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:23 PM?
> Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil?
> ?
>> Please tell me this is some of that dry English humour I keep hearing > 
>> about but can't ever understand because I'm a 'merkin.?
>>?
>> MAG?
>>?
>>?
>> Message: 11?
>> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:10:08 +0100?
>> From: "Luisa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil?
>> To: "Alec McQueen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "list leedslist"?
>> <[email protected]>?
>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";?
>> reply-type=original?
>>?
>> Personally I have always felt that Ken was here for the fun and 
>> enjoyment?
>> not money.?
>> I have suffered for my opinion but stood by it and am glad now that 
>> others?
>> are finally seeing the light.?
>> Ken and Den 9and Gus) will see us back to the prem in successive 
>> seasons.?
>>?
>>?
>> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alec McQueen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
>> To: "list leedslist" <[email protected]>?
>> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 11:01 PM?
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Yoevil?
>>?
>>?
>>> Sign of a team that is going to win the league? Winning matches that?
>>> should?
>>> have been lost/drawn.?
>>>?
>>> I am now at the stage where I believe we WILL win the league. I am also?
>>> now?
>>> a total Wise convert. He is everything our previous few managers were >> 
>>> not,?
>>> most of all he is a fighter, has passion, and clearly expects this from?
>>> his?
>>> players. If they don't provide this, then they are given the 
>>> message....?
>>>?
>>> Dare I say it, Leeds are on the up again. And despite what everyone 
>>> else?
>>> will say, I think SOME of this has to be due to Bates. I have always >> 
>>> liked?
>>> people who don't give a Flying F*** what anyone else thinks, and Bates 
>>> is?
>>> clearly like this. I am sure he has made some mistakes along the way, 
>>> but?
>>> I?
>>> simply do not believe he is in this for his own pocket. Who in their >> 
>>> right?
>>> mind would invest in Leeds United when he did if he was seriously only?
>>> interested in their own pocket? Did he do some stuff to try to protect 
>>>  >> his?
>>> investment, yes he probably did. But overall, I think he has tried his?
>>> best?
>>> to bring Leeds back to stability and growth.?
>>>?
>>> You have to admit, he has done this.?
>>>?
>>> Lit blue touch paper, stand back....?
>>> Alec?
>>>?
>>>?
>>>?
>>> On 07/10/2007, DAVID NATTAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:?
>>>>?
>>>> Pubs in town were buzzing again before the game , lots of singing and?
>>>> everyone still on a high from Tuesday night.?
>>>> In pre match discussion we tried to work out what team we would put >>> 
>>>> out?
>>>> - all expected Tres & Becks to be recalled, but would Westlake's 
>>>> heroics?
>>>> keep him on the bench or ever better ? Would Hughes, at times on 
>>>> Tuesday?
>>>> a?
>>>> fish out of water stay at left back or would Clapham get the nod ? >>> 
>>>> Would?
>>>> Dennis grasp the nettle and make Thommo pay for such a poor 
>>>> performance?
>>>> on?
>>>> Tuesday ? Would De Costa get on the bench ? What would he do with the 
>>>> 2?
>>>> on?
>>>> loan strikers ??
>>>> So for a change lots of decisions to be made?
>>>> In the event Clapham was restored to usual back 5, Kandol & Becks were?
>>>> both back, Hughes back in midfield with Prutton, Douglas and 
>>>> Carole -so?
>>>> no?
>>>> place for Thommo at all and even more surprisingly the 'injured' Flo 
>>>> was?
>>>> on?
>>>> the bench alongside De Costa and De Vries got the nod instead of >>> 
>>>> Andrews.?
>>>>?
>>>> I have reported so much on pre match because the game itself was a >>> 
>>>> huge?
>>>> disappointment. The game never got going and the crowd was the 
>>>> quietest?
>>>> it?
>>>> has been all season. Up front our much vaunted and so far excellent?
>>>> pairing?
>>>> were subdued beyond belief and at times Kandol was the Kandol of last?
>>>> season?
>>>> - yes he was that bad.?
>>>> Yoevil surrendered midfield possession and territory to us and we did?
>>>> not have a clue what to do with it - at times the back four were 
>>>> giving?
>>>> it?
>>>> to the midfield begging them to do something with the ball but the?
>>>> midfield?
>>>> kept giving it back to them. with the end result a hopeful hoof from?
>>>> Heath?
>>>> or Casper to our lethargic strikers - not good.?
>>>> Although it was obvious they had come for a nil nil Yoevil did catch?
>>>> us?
>>>> out on a couple of occasions - once when the ball was hit straight at?
>>>> Casper, another time he pulled off a good save and then finally with 
>>>> 10?
>>>> mins?
>>>> to go their totally unmarked forward missed an open goal. At the other?
>>>> end?
>>>> we did pretty much nothing.?
>>>> Then just as the game was petering out we realised that this is Leeds?
>>>> United 2007 managed by Dennis Wise and not Leeds United 2005-6 under?
>>>> Blackwell?
>>>> Wise brought on Flo and De Vries and just as we were debating which of?
>>>> the strikers was coming off or would it be both as a straight swap - 
>>>> the?
>>>> board came up for Prutton and Carole - we were going with 4 big men up?
>>>> front?
>>>> - and f**k me it worked !!?
>>>> First a cross was met by Kandol and their keeper pulled off his first?
>>>> good save of the game , then with minutes remaining Douglas crossed 
>>>> into?
>>>> the?
>>>> crowded box and De Vries put it in - another last minute winner !! >>> 
>>>> Forget?
>>>> the Scousers of the 80s or Scum of the 90s this team are the last 
>>>> minute?
>>>> specialists !! Cue delirium all round with fans and players going >>> 
>>>> mental.?
>>>> OK?
>>>> they had one more good chance in the 4 mins of time added on because 
>>>> of?
>>>> their time wasting but the lads header went past the post.?
>>>>?
>>>> Are you lucky if they miss sitters \ have shots cleared off the line \?
>>>> hit the post \ keeper pulls off a great save or is it good defending \?
>>>> poor?
>>>> attacking ? That seems to be the story of our season so far - I am at?
>>>> present going with the "you make your own luck" theory.?
>>>>?
>>>> Dennis has a team that runs and fights till it drops and that knows it?
>>>> is not over till the final whistle goes. Added to that the fact that 
>>>> he?
>>>> himself is willing to gamble for a win , throwing on extra forwards >>> 
>>>> means?
>>>> we?
>>>> will always be a danger in the closing stages.?
>>>>?
>>>> So all in all not a great game but yet again another great ending?
>>>>?
>>>> We are Leeds !!!?
>>>>?
>>>>?
>>>> Dave?
>>?
>>?
>>?
>>?
>>?
>>?
>>?
>>?
>> ________________________________________________________________________?
>> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - > 
>> http://mail.aol.com?
>> _______________________________________________?
>> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
>>  > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of 
>> contributors.?
>> Leedslist mailing list?
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist?
>> 6 in a bloody row!?
>>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
> http://mail.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
> accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
> Leedslist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> 6 in a bloody row!
> 

_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
6 in a bloody row! 

Reply via email to