But why is it being delayed at all? What possible logic is there to delaying the decision announcement? Cheers Alec
On 19/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It isn't; it's now due by May 1st - which being my birthday, it better be > good news! > > Andy C > > > Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Alec McQueen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:29:06 > To:[email protected] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [LU] Can anyone explain... > > > .... any logical reason why the appeal decision should be delayed 3 weeks? > It > just makes no sense at all. > Cheers > A > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! > DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
