Wouldnt in any way affect the arbitration ruling, at most it will mean some financial sanction on Leeds.
Leeds also have an argument to say that the info they gave was nothing more than was in the public domain anyway, as the details of Leeds' case were known because of the High Court proceedings we filed against the FL. Dont panic Mr Mannering > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2008/apr/23/leedsunited > Sounds like we broke the confidentiality rule in the arbitration! What > the feck where Leeds thinking? I can now see the whole arbitration being > declared null and void because of this. Just when I was beginning to > think we might actually get some points back. > > > Best, > > Jeremy > > _________________________________________________________________ > Make i'm yours. Create a custom banner to support your cause. > http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Contribute/Default.aspx?source=TXT_TAGHM_MSN_Make_IM_Yours > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! > DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
